Regulation 18 Draft Local Plan 2025 Online Version and Consultation

Support

Representation ID: 1156

Received: 01/02/2026

Respondent: Torquay Neighbourhood Forum (Statutory / General Consultation Body)

Particularly endorse Policy TC7’s focus on a diverse
evening economy; by encouraging art, culture, and
varied activities, we can ensure Torquay remains a
safe and vibrant destination for all ages.

Support

Representation ID: 1157

Received: 01/02/2026

Respondent: Torquay Neighbourhood Forum (Statutory / General Consultation Body)

Strongly advocate for a more explicit link between art, culture, and public health within the SC and TC policies. Engagement with the arts is not merely a leisure activity; it is a vital contributor to the health and wellbeing of our community, offering proven benefits in reducing social isolation and supporting mental health through 'social prescribing.' I believe that by embedding cultural hubs and creative spaces within the heart of Torquay, we can create a town centre that functions as a 'wellbeing destination.' This approach, where environmental enhancements reflect our maritime heritage and cultural activities provide a year-round draw, will not only support our independent businesses but also foster a healthier, more resilient, and more connected population

Object

Representation ID: 1158

Received: 01/02/2026

Respondent: Torquay Neighbourhood Forum (Statutory / General Consultation Body)

‘expected to be achieved’ – is speculative. Needs to be ‘will be delivered by’ ‘connected to the existing transport network across all layers of the transport hierarchy’ – we would argue there is currently no cycle transport network. There are no acceptable cycle links between any of the three towns that are safe and accessible to all. This is fundamental and the plan must seek to address these shortcomings. There is no point in development connecting to an unsafe network as this will not enable cycling. Proposals set out within the Devon and Torbay Local Transport Plan will be supported subject to other Local Plan Policies. – very weak statement for what is the adopted, strategic local transport plan. Explanation 6.9 is strong but needs embedding in policy. No mention of health and wellbeing elements of active travel – creation of healthy neighborhoods, public health benefits, local shops etc… 6.10 – there are way more benefits to improving local public transport – equity, justice, de carbonisation of transport – given low levels of car ownership and forced car ownership in our areas of deprivation this is a key driver of economic success, town centre regeneration and growth delivery 6.18 – seize opportunities for highway improvements to improve safety and accessibility for all users in line with the transport hierarchy

Object

Representation ID: 1159

Received: 01/02/2026

Respondent: Torquay Neighbourhood Forum (Statutory / General Consultation Body)

‘To assess and mitigate the impact of development and to promote sustainable travel choices, the following information will be required to support planning applications’. This is not ‘information’ – developers must take a vision-led approach to sustainable transport planning in line with the transport hierarchy and aims to enable sustainable transport options. Plans must be monitored and enforceable through planning obligations. Needs modal targets which are realistic and enforceable 6.22 ‘can’ – needs to be removed 6.23 Is very negative – sustainable transport provision is a key factor for economic growth, should promoted as such and presented positively.

Object

Representation ID: 1160

Received: 01/02/2026

Respondent: Torquay Neighbourhood Forum (Statutory / General Consultation Body)

Very weak – ‘Where developments generate new
or additional journeys, it may be necessary to seek
financial contributions towards enhanced
transport infrastructure or service provision.’
Policy should embed vision-led transport planning.
All developments affect transport so statement
‘especially if…’ is not necessary. We should not be
trying to ‘mitigate effects’ we must be envisaging a
transport environment and development should
positively contribute to this through financial or
actual infrastructure improvements.
Improvements must be secured and delivered
prior to occupation in order to effectively promote
positive behaviour change.

Object

Representation ID: 1161

Received: 01/02/2026

Respondent: Torquay Neighbourhood Forum (Statutory / General Consultation Body)

Policy needs to talk about permeability in line with transport hierarchy – development should always contribute to active travel links wherever possible to support active travel. Connection needs to be beyond the ‘red line’ where lack of ongoing access exists this needs to be provided. ‘Unfettered access’ – should be balanced by the provision of health/livable neighborhoods, designed for people and appropriate to the setting. 2.27 – should include maintenance like 2.28 does?

Object

Representation ID: 1162

Received: 01/02/2026

Respondent: Torquay Neighbourhood Forum (Statutory / General Consultation Body)

The Green Infrastructure Management Plan is
dated 2011 and is grossly out of date, so irrelevant.
Where is its replacement?

Object

Representation ID: 1163

Received: 01/02/2026

Respondent: Torquay Neighbourhood Forum (Statutory / General Consultation Body)

Need to reduce exemptions from CIL such that more CIL Funds become available.

Support

Representation ID: 1164

Received: 01/02/2026

Respondent: Torquay Neighbourhood Forum (Statutory / General Consultation Body)

Document states ““…all development proposals will be required to be designed to be resilient to climate change and minimise carbon dioxide and wider greenhouse gas emissions”. The document also talks about MAXIMISING renewable energy generation. To achieve net zero carbon emissions during building use (i.e. energy for building heating and cooling etc.), the “Passivhaus” construction standard should be specified for all new builds.

Support

Representation ID: 1165

Received: 01/02/2026

Respondent: Torquay Neighbourhood Forum (Statutory / General Consultation Body)

Policy is welcome but needs to not be just 1:1 as this could be a get out for developers. They could demolish one building and build 2. Should be a factor in all development, not just major.